第58頁(第2/6 页)

and grul would like to iply，and that it cannot expn the chronological peculiarities of theophanes&r;chronicle，which，on the ntrary，follows the septeber reckong

[5]edcde boor，leipzig 1880the london sbritish eu add19390（nth century）was not ed by de boor，but has recently been ade known by lorosz，the london ancript of nikephoros&l;breviariu&r;，budapest 1948，who gives the text of the first part（to p15，2，edde boor），and for the send part，where the difference is uch less，he llates with de boor&r;s text and gives the variant readgsfor a full aount of the literary work and pernality of nicephor，see alexander，partnicephor

[6]french transby facler，histoire d&r;héracli par l&r;évêe sebéos，traduite de l&r;arnien et annotée，paris 1904rsian transby kpatkanov，istorija ipirakla，perevod s arjanskogo（history of the eperor heracli，a translation fro the arnian），stpetersburg 1862on the uch discsed estion of the structure，the urces and the date of the work see ssal插sjanc，&l;istorik sebeos&r;，5527（1949），94 ff

[7]edwith french transby hzotenberg，chronie de jean evêe de nikiou，notices et extraits des ssde la biblnationale 10104（1883）；english transby rh插rles，the chronicle of john，bishop of nikiu，translfro zotenberg&r;s ethiopic text，london 1916

[8]edwith lat trans the rp scriptchristorient，scriptores syri，ser3，vol4，1-3（1903-5）。

[9]ibvol7（1910）。

[10]edwith french transby jb插bot，la chronie de ichel le syrien，3 vols，paris 1899