第91頁(第2/4 页)

jskija univ（yearbook of the university of fia），32，9，p1 ff

[133]cfruncian，bulgarian epire 72 f

[134]ostrogorsky，bilderstreit，p51，fragnt 17，。

[135]the acta of the uncil of 754 attepted to establish the oclast pot of view by a detailed discsion on a christological basis;the odules throughout the ntroversy，but especially durg the latter period，al ephasized the extent to which the teachg about s was bound up with christological doctrethe whole proble is sud up by a sgle sentence of the synod of 815 when the odules are reproached becae they（ostrogorsky，bilderstreit，p50，fragnt 14）only those sufficiently failiar with the acta of 754 will appreciate the significance of this sentence upholdg the provocative and nio thesis then expounded by which the odules were aed of fallg to the heresies either of onophysis or of nestorianis

[136]i t ata this view， spite of the different opion of pjalexander&l;the oclast uncil of stphia and its defition&r;，dubarton oaks papers 7（1953），35 ff，and all the ore sce the nceptions which he puts forward as representg the new teachg of the synod of 815 are not their own ideas but only a citation fro basil the great， that it is clear that the views which alexander would like to attribute to the nth-century oclasts are really taken fro basil

[137]ansi 14，417 ff

[138] vasiliev，byzance et les arabes 1，22 ff，it is ataed that thoas was an arnianthis is not，however，vasiliev&r;s own view（ the origal text he openly declares f