第237頁(第1/4 页)

[180]rjloenertz，&l;jean v paléologue à venise&r;（1370-71），reb 16（1953），1217 ff，gives an excellent renstruction of the story of john v venice and has th relved a uch disputed problehalecki，un epereur，335 ffand b 17（1944/45）313 ff，has asserted that the arrest of john v venice as a debtor was a later lend and that he reaed a year venice of his own free willdolr，&l;johannes 7。&r;，22 ff，bz（1933），134 and 43（1950），441 and 插ranis，&l;palaeologi and ottoan turks&r;286 ff，have poted out that this view is untenable and have argued that john v was fact held venice as an lvent debtorwith the exhative study ofloenertz，halecki&r;s thesis has fally been repudiated，while the opion held by dolr and 插ranis（which i adopted earlier editions of this book），has been shown to need ore precise defition，although adittedly this does not affect the essence of the atter but only certa nuancesas loenertz hiself says：&l;he（john v）was virtually a prer venice;not a prer for debt，as has been wrongly stated，but all the sa a prer of his debts，or at least，of his lack of oney&r;（p218）and aga：&l;the signoria， order to prevent the eperor fro leavg，had no need to put his feet the stocks，for sce he had neither oney or credit，he uld not provision his galleys for the return journey&r;（p225）。

[181]lapros-aantos，no47，32，for the datg;on this cf插ranis，&l;short chronicle&r;340 and&l;palaeologi and ottoan turks&r;292

[182]dcydonès，rrespondance，edloenertz，1，no37，5

[183]lovje