第39頁(第2/4 页)

on forced to ake，but which uld not save hi，see ibid107

[94]evagri，111-14

[95]de ceri418 and 419

[96]cfewbrooks，h i（1911），484;bury，later roan eprie 12441 ff；ste，studien，146 and bas-epire，192 ff

[97]cfrpblake，&l;the oary refor of anastasi i and its enoic iplications&r;，studies the history of culture 1942，84 ff

[98]john alalas 394：see al evagri，edbidez-parntier，p144cfthe rearks of wenssl，bz 42（1942），260，whose terpretation is to be aepted spite of the disagreent of karayannopulos，&l;die chryteleia der iuga&r;，bz 49（1956），72 ff

[99]the eptio-beca very widespread and resebled a tax 插racter，with the result that fally the iddle byzante period（as i was able to show y&l;steuerde&r;50）it ca to denote the land tax which was by then naturally paid goldcfal hiss，ld-und naturalwirts插ftliche erscheungsforn i staatlichen aufbau italiens wahrend der gotenzeit，breslau 1931，1 ff；and ste，bas-eprie，200this is not of urse to ata that the eptio was not troduced until the reign of anastasi 1，as karayannopulos，opcit，75 ff，wrongly atas

[100]propi，anecdeta（edhaury，operaù3，1），121

[101]the des are regarded rely as circ factions not only by gibbon（edbury），4，220，but al by wilken，die parteien der rennbahn，vornehlich i byzantischen kaiserthu，abhdpresakad1827，217 ff，rabaud，de byzanto hippodroo et circensib factionib（1870;french suary revue des deux ondes 1871=etudes sur l&r;histbyz2[1919]，3 ff）and even onnier，&l;epibolé&r;16（1892），504