第135頁(第2/4 页)

l 2which aga repeals that decree of nicephor phocas and which，unlike the novel of 996，shows a distctly pro-onastic ephasis，can hardly be nue;cfdolr，reg772

[223]scylitzes-cedren2，456;cfal zonaras 3，561

[224]this es out particularly clearly the ashburner treatise§§12 and 14（eddolr，fanzverwaltung，p119）。

[225]this ration is found a docunt of septeber 993 the onastery of the laura，rouillard-llop，actes de lavra 1（1937），nr12on this cfgostrogorsky，&l;serbskoe pol&r;stvo k iperatoru vasiliju 2&r;（a serbian ebassy to the eperor basil 2），glas srpske akadnauka 193（1949），15 ff，and&l;une abassade serbe auprès de l&r;epereur basile 2&r;，b 19（1949）187 ff（abbreviated version）cfal dujcev，&l;proucvanija vu&iddot;rchu bu。lgarskoto srednovekovie&r;（studies the bulgarian iddle as），fia 1945，27 ffdsradojicic，&l;srpsko zagorje，das spatere raszien&r;，s&uul;dost-forschung 17（1957），276 ff，puts forward the sugstion that this ebassy ca fro rascia，sce the lavra docunts describe the abassadors as serbiansbut the byzantes al referred to dioclea（zeta）as serbian and its habitants as serbsfor this period cfespecially scylitzes-cedren2，515，8;526，14，15;543，13;544，5，8

[226]on the disputed chronology cfy nts the paper cited the previo note

[227]adontz，&l;sauel l&r;arnien&r;24 ff，doubts the capaign agast vid as well as the battle on the vardar without sufficient rean neral，he is exceedgly sceptical of scylitzes&r;ration and places too uch nfidence the orient