第128頁(第1/4 页)

[87]cfthe detailed study by cango，&l;the lend of leo the wise&r;，zrvi 6（1950），59 ff

[88]，lib1-Ⅻ edcferri and jrcati，studi e testi 25（1914）；lib103-10103 edfdolr，ibid51（1929），lib10104-1010107 edsthoerann and eseidl，ibid107（1943）cffdolr and eseidl，&l;beitra und berichtigunn zu tipukeitos&r;，bz 39（1939），146 ff；eseidl，&l;die basilikenscholien i tipukeitos&r;，bz 44（1951）（dolr-festschrift），534 ff

[89]sufficient aount is often taken of this fact，and the basilica are often aepted as a urce for the nth century without the necessary cautioncfapkazdan，&l;vasiliki kak istoriceskij istoik&r;（the basilica as an historical urce），vv 14（1958），56 f，who rightly ephasizes that the basilica reflect the political and cial situation of the sixth century，not of the nththis view is not substantially repudiated by the objections of jsjuzjuov，&l;vasiliki kak istoik dlja vnutrennej istorii vizantii&r;（the basilica as a urce for the ternal history of byzantiu），ibid67 ff，and eelipsic，&l;neskol&r;ko zacanij o vasilikach kak istoike&r;（ observations on the basilica as a urce），ibid76 ff

[90] spite of spulber，les novelles de léon le sa（1934），81 f，the widely-held view that the novels were publi射d before leo 6 ncded his send arria still stands，for novel 90 expressly ndens send arriasit t however be rebered that leo 6 did not ntract his send arria until the sprg of 898，as grul，&l;chronologie&r;5 ff，has shownan earlier date than this is dicated by the fact that the only patriarch nt