第61頁(第3/5 页)

ugoslakad130（1897），11 ff，nnodilo，historija serdnjega vijeka（history of the iddle as），3（1905），433 ff，this view had had the support of the highest authorities the fields of slav history and philology，cdg kjirecek，lniederle，ststanojevic，fsisicrecently there has been a reaction and it has been poted out that there are not sufficient grounds for rejectg the aount of nstante 7 which，though ebroidered with lendary details，is essence thoroughly reliablecfthe rative article by danastasijevic：sstanojevic，narodna enciklopedija 4（1929）81 ff，who hiself defends the trorthess of porphyronit（cfal his article narodna enciklopedija 3，607 ff）the study of the proble has been advanced by the iportant research of lhauptann（cfespecially his article&l;seoba hrvata i srba&r;（the igration of the croats and serbs），jugoslistorcapis 3（1937），30 ff）of particular vae are the nts by bgrafenauer，prilog kritici izvestaja konstanta porfironita o doseljenju hrvata&r;（a ntribution to the critical evaation of the ration given by nstante porphyronit on the iigration of the croats），histzbornik 5（1952），1-56，who any respects follows hauptann，but who rightly rejects his theory of the caucasian orig of the serbs and croats，and of the orig of the croatian aristocracycfal fdvornik，the akg of the central and eastern europe，london，1949，215 ffand the slavs，their early history and civilization，boston，1956，62 ff，and al the stiulatg discsion by hgrégoire，&l;l&r;ori et le no des croates et des serbes&r;，b 17（1944/5），8